This article exists as part of the online archive for HuffPost Australia, which closed in 2021.

Allen's Will Change The Name Of Controversial Lollies

Red Skins and Chicos will be renamed to avoid "marginalising friends, neighbours and colleagues," Allen's said.
Confectionery products, Red Skins by Nestle are seen in a store in Sydney, Australia June 23, 2020. REUTERS/Jill Gralow
REUTERS
Confectionery products, Red Skins by Nestle are seen in a store in Sydney, Australia June 23, 2020. REUTERS/Jill Gralow

Nestle will change the name of two popular confectionery products, Red Skins and Chicos sweets, the food and beverage giant said on Tuesday, amid a global debate over racial inequality.

The move is part of the corporate world’s reckoning following anti-racism protests triggered by the death of George Floyd in police custody in Minneapolis late last month.

“These names have overtones which are out of step with Nestlé’s values, which are rooted in respect,” the company said in a statement on its website. “While new names have not yet been finalised, we will move quickly to change these names.”

Redskin is a derogatory term that refers to First Nations American peoples, while chico, which translates to “boy” in Spanish, can be offensive to those of Latin American descent.

Last week, PepsiCo Inc said it would change the name and brand image of its Aunt Jemima pancake mix and syrup, which have been criticised as racist.

Following PepsiCo’s move, the makers of Uncle Ben’s rice, owned by Mars Inc; Mrs. Butterworth’s syrup, owned by ConAgra Brands Inc and Cream of Wheat porridge, owned by B&G Foods Inc, also said they would review their packaging.

Reporting by Swati Pandey

Close
This article exists as part of the online archive for HuffPost Australia. Certain site features have been disabled. If you have questions or concerns, please check our FAQ or contact support@huffpost.com.